Ministers of the Scottish Parliament rejected new nuclear power stations and deemed them as dangerous and unnecessary.

Energy Minister Jim Mather wants the billions of pounds that could be spent on nuclear power to be reallocated to make Scotland and the UK a world leader in clean, renewable technologies.

In the press release issued by the Scottish government, its submission to the UK Government consultation on nuclear power shows that:

<!–[if !supportLists]–>· <!–[endif]–>Scotland already produces more energy than it consumes and new technologies are far more secure than relying on the finite resources of imported uranium.

<!–[if !supportLists]–>· <!–[endif]–>Renewable energy generation produces less carbon emissions than nuclear power.

<!–[if !supportLists]–>· <!–[endif]–>No new nuclear power removes the need for transportation and disposal of nuclear waste and potential terrorist threats.

<!–[if !supportLists]–>· <!–[endif]–>The costs of new nuclear power stations are likely to be significantly higher than the UK Government estimates- which will be passed on to consumers and taxpayers.

<!–[if !supportLists]–>· <!–[endif]–>Investing in renewable, energy efficiency and carbon capture would give the UK and Scotland a world lead in these technologies.

Minister Jim Mather said, “We completely reject the development of dangerous, unnecessary and costly new nuclear power stations in Scotland. We already have clean, green and reliable alternatives. Scotland has massive renewable potentials, as well as significant opportunities for clean fossil-fuel technologies and carbon storage. Harnessing that potential can meet our future energy demands several times over, while tackling climate change. Scotland already has the skills and leadership to pursue a clean, low carbon approach. A vibrant and growing energy sector will make a significant contribution to Scotland’s prosperity through investment and jobs.”

Minister Mather went on to say, “Perversely spending billions of pounds to develop nuclear power stations could have a huge impact on the research and development of long-term clean energy alternatives. Instead I want to see investment directed toward the development of green energy technologies in Scotland to give Scotland and the UK a world lead. Studies show there is more than enough renewable potential in the whole of the UK and especially in Scotland to provide a diverse, low carbon electricity supply, so the argument that we need nuclear is totally redundant. In addition, we believe that renewable energy produces less carbon than nuclear power. It is our responsibility to the health and prosperity of future generations to ensure that we oppose new nuclear power, which will impose an increasing burden of toxic radioactive waste for hundreds of years.

In conclusion, Minister Mather stated,” The UK Government has already made it mind to develop nuclear power stations without properly considering the alternatives or even allowing the public as part of this consultation. I believe that our position has the clear support of the majority of MSPs and public opinion. The UK Government now needs to accept the weight of evidence and abandon its disastrously short-sighted and unwanted proposals.”




  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s



%d bloggers like this: